Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Curr Med Sci ; 41(6): 1096-1104, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1404664

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study data about SARS-CoV-2 virus shedding and clarify the risk factors for prolonged virus shedding. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) in Wuhan Union Hospital. We compared clinical features among patients with prolonged (a positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA on day 23 after illness onset) and short virus shedding and evaluated risk factors associated with prolonged virus shedding by multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 238 patients, the median age was 55.5 years, 57.1% were female, 92.9% (221/238) were administered with arbidol, 58.4% (139/238) were given arbidol in combination with interferon. The median duration of SARS-CoV-2 virus shedding was 23 days (IQR, 17.8-30 days) with a longest one of 51 days. The patients with prolonged virus shedding had higher value of D-dimer (P=0.002), IL-6 (P<0.001), CRP (P=0.005) and more lobes lung lesion (P=0.014) on admission, as well as older age (P=0.017) and more patients with hypertension (P=0.044) than in those the virus shedding less than 23 days. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that prolonged viral shedding was significantly associated with initiation arbidol >8 days after symptom onset [OR: 2.447, 95% CI (1.351-4.431)], ≥3 days from onset of symptoms to first medical visitation [OR: 1.880, 95% CI (1.035-3.416)], illness onset before Jan. 31, 2020 [OR: 3.289, 95% CI (1.474-7.337)]. Arbidol in combination with interferon was also significantly associated with shorter virus shedding [OR: 0.363, 95% CI (0.191-0.690)]. CONCLUSION: Duration of SARS-CoV-2 virus shedding was long. Early initiation of arbidol and arbidol in combination with interferon as well as consulting doctor timely after illness onset were helpful for SARS-CoV-2 clearance.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19/virología , Indoles/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2 , Esparcimiento de Virus , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , China/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Interferones/administración & dosificación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pandemias , ARN Viral/análisis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Factores de Tiempo , Esparcimiento de Virus/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(6): e14123, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1112248

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) is a global health concern that has become a pandemic over the past few months. This study aims at understanding the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 patients with pleural effusion. METHODS: COVID-19 patients were retrospectively enrolled from the Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Pharyngeal swabs from patients were tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Patients with COVID-19 were divided into two groups based on their computed tomography (CT) scans for the presence of pleural effusion at admission. We compared the clinical features, laboratory findings, scans and clinical outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: Pleural effusion was observed in 9.19% of the patients. Patients with pleural effusion were more likely to be severe or critical cases. Moreover, patients with pleural effusion were associated with increased mortality. Of the 799 discharged patients, patients with pleural effusion had longer hospital stays and duration of viral shedding since the onset of symptoms as compared with that for patients without pleural effusion. After discharge, 217 patients visited for a follow-up CT re-examination at the Union Hospital. The CT scans showed that patients with pleural effusion required a longer time to resolve the lung inflammation after the onset of COVID-19 as compared with the time required by patients without pleural effusion. CONCLUSION: This population of patients requires special attention and pleural effusion may be an indicator of poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Derrame Pleural , Humanos , Pulmón , Derrame Pleural/etiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Curr Med Sci ; 41(1): 24-30, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1082574

RESUMEN

The role of corticosteroids in the treatment of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is controversial. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of adjuvant corticosteroids treatment on the outcome of patients with COVID-19 (n=966), using Propensity Score Matching to adjust for potential differences between the corticosteroids group (n=289) and the non-corticosteroids group (n=677). Analysis of data without adjusting differences in baseline characteristics indicated that the proportion of mechanical ventilation and the mortality was higher in the corticosteroids treatment group in total or severe/critical patients. The duration of viral shedding was longer in the non-corticosteroids treatment group in total or general/mild patients. After adjusting the difference between the corticosteroids and non-corticosteroids treatment group, the analysis revealed that the use of corticosteroids had no effect on the duration of viral shedding, in-hospital mortality or 28-day mortality.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Esparcimiento de Virus/efectos de los fármacos
4.
Respiration ; 100(2): 116-126, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1044350

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is still no clinical evidence available to support or to oppose corticosteroid treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid given to the hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized control trial. Adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who were admitted to the general ward were randomly assigned to either receive methylprednisolone or not for 7 days. The primary end point was the incidence of clinical deterioration 14 days after randomization. RESULTS: We terminated this trial early because the number of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in all the centers decreased in late March. Finally, a total of 86 COVID-19 patients underwent randomization. There was no difference of the incidence of clinical deterioration between the methylprednisolone group and control group (4.8 vs. 4.8%, p = 1.000). The duration of throat viral RNA detectability in the methylprednisolone group was 11 days (interquartile range, 6-16 days), which was significantly longer than that in the control group (8 days [2-12 days], p = 0.030). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in other secondary outcomes. Mass cytometry discovered CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells in the methylprednisolone group which were significantly lower than those in the control group after randomization (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: From this prematurely closed trial, we found that the short-term early use of corticosteroid could suppress the immune cells, which may prolong severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 shedding in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04273321.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Faringe/química , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Esparcimiento de Virus , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Complejo CD3 , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/transmisión , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Intervención Médica Temprana , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Femenino , Humanos , Células Asesinas Naturales , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Habitaciones de Pacientes , Faringe/virología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Método Simple Ciego , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T , Linfocitos T , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Curr Med Sci ; 40(4): 597-601, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-695683

RESUMEN

In late December 2019, COVID-19 was firstly recognized in Wuhan, China and spread rapidly to all of the provinces of China. The West Campus of Wuhan Union Hospital, the designated hospital to admit and treat the severe and critically ill COVID-19 cases, has treated a large number of such patients with great success and obtained lots of valuable experiences based on the Chinese guideline (V7.0). To standardize and share the treatment procedures of severe and critically ill cases, Wuhan Union Hospital has established a working group and formulated an operational recommendation, including the monitoring, early warning indicators, and several treatment principles for severe and critically ill cases. The treatment experiences may provide some constructive suggestions for treating the severe and critically ill COVID-19 cases all over the world.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , China/epidemiología , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Hospitales , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Medicina Tradicional China , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Terapia Respiratoria/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
6.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(8): 1753-1759.e2, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-613156

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We compared clinical, laboratory, radiological, and outcome features of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) with pneumonia, with vs without diarrhea. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of 84 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan Union Hospital, China, from January 19 through February 7, 2020. Cases were confirmed by real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR of nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Blood samples were analyzed for white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, alanine aminotransferase, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and in some cases, immunoglobulins, complement, lymphocyte subsets, and cytokines. Virus RNA was detected in stool samples by real-time PCR. RESULTS: Of the 84 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, 26 (31%) had diarrhea. The duration of fever and dyspnea in patients with diarrhea was significantly longer than those without diarrhea (all P < .05). Stool samples from a higher proportion of patients with diarrhea tested positive for virus RNA (69%) than from patients without diarrhea (17%) (P < .001). As of February 19, a lower proportion of patients with diarrhea had a negative result from the latest throat swab for SARS-CoV-2 (77%) than patients without diarrhea (97%) (P = .010), during these patients' hospitalization. Of 76 patients with a negative result from their latest throat swab test during hospitalization, a significantly higher proportion of patients with diarrhea had a positive result from the retest for SARS-CoV-2 in stool (45%) than patients without diarrhea (20%) (P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: At a single center in Wuhan, China, 31% of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia had diarrhea. A significantly higher proportion of patients with diarrhea have virus RNA in stool than patients without diarrhea. Elimination of SARS-CoV-2 from stool takes longer than elimination from the nose and throat.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Portador Sano/virología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/patología , Diarrea/epidemiología , Diarrea/etiología , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Análisis Químico de la Sangre , COVID-19 , China , Diarrea/patología , Heces/virología , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucosa Nasal/virología , Pandemias , Faringe/virología , ARN Viral/análisis , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA